The Defend Trade Secrets Act: Law Explained

Protecting trade secrets is vital for businesses, but the legal landscape has been complex.

The Defend Trade Secrets Act aims to provide clearer legal recourse for companies whose trade secrets have been misappropriated, both domestically and abroad.

This article will explain the key provisions of the DTSA, including its scope, enforcement mechanisms, whistleblower protections, relationship to state laws and international considerations, and overall impact on strategies for safeguarding intellectual property.

Introduction to the Defend Trade Secrets Act

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) was passed by the 114th United States Congress in 2016 to create a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. Prior to the DTSA, trade secret owners relied on state laws and common law for protection. The DTSA provides a consistent, nationwide approach to trade secret litigation in federal courts.

Historical Context: From the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 to the DTSA

The DTSA builds upon the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996, which made trade secret theft a federal crime. However, the EEA did not provide trade secret owners a civil remedy in federal court. The DTSA fills this gap by enabling companies to sue in federal court when their trade secrets are misappropriated.

Purpose and Goals of the DTSA

The main goals of the DTSA are to:

Provide consistent standards for trade secret misappropriation across states
Give trade secret owners access to federal courts
Harmonize the differences in trade secret laws between states
Deter and punish theft of trade secrets

Key Provisions of the Law

The DTSA:

Defines trade secret misappropriation
Allows civil action in federal court
Provides remedies like injunctions and damages
Protects whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets under certain conditions

Understanding 18 U.S.C. § 1836: The Legal Foundation

18 U.S.C. § 1836 forms the basis for civil claims under the DTSA. It defines key terms like trade secret and misappropriation. The law also specifies the types of remedies available, including injunctions and monetary damages. Section 1836 brings uniformity across states regarding definitions and remedies for trade secret theft.

What are the elements of the defend trade secrets act claim?

To bring a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), the plaintiff must establish three key elements:

The plaintiff owned a trade secret
- A trade secret is confidential business information that provides economic value from not being publicly known. This could include things like proprietary formulas, manufacturing techniques, pricing data, customer lists, etc.
- The plaintiff must have taken reasonable measures to keep the information secret.
The defendant misappropriated the trade secret
- Misappropriation means the unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of the trade secret.
- This includes theft, hacking, breach of duty to maintain secrecy, etc. by the defendant or another person.
The defendant's actions damaged the plaintiff
- The plaintiff must show they suffered harm from the misappropriation.
- This could include lost profits, loss of competitive advantage, reputational damage, etc.

To obtain relief, the trade secret owner would need to provide evidence supporting each of these three elements in their complaint. The available remedies include injunctions, damages, attorney's fees, and royalties.

What is the protection of trade secrets law?

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides federal protection for trade secrets in the United States. Some key aspects of trade secrets protection under this law include:

Legal Protection

Trade secrets are protected from misappropriation, which involves the unauthorized acquisition and use or disclosure of the trade secret information. Companies can take legal action if their trade secrets are misappropriated.
The law provides the ability to obtain injunctions to prevent actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets. This allows companies to stop others from improperly using or disclosing their confidential information.

Remedies

If trade secrets are misappropriated, the law provides remedies such as damages for actual losses and unjust enrichment. This allows companies to recover monetary compensation.
In cases of willful and malicious misappropriation, the court can award exemplary damages up to two times the original damages amount. This further deters theft of trade secrets.

Reporting Period

The DTSA has a three-year statute of limitations. Companies need to take legal action within three years of discovering the alleged trade secret theft.

So in summary, the DTSA provides meaningful legal recourse to protect valuable company secrets and intellectual property. It deters theft and misuse while compensating victims.

What is the defend trade secrets act immunity?

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) includes an immunity provision to protect whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets under certain circumstances. Specifically, the DTSA states that an individual cannot be held criminally or civilly liable under any federal or state trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret if the disclosure meets the following requirements:

The disclosure is made in confidence to a federal, state, or local government official, either directly or indirectly, or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law.
The disclosure is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding under seal, meaning it is not accessible to the public.
The individual files the lawsuit alleging retaliation by an employer for reporting a suspected violation of law, provided the individual first tried to get the employer to correct the violation (unless reporting the violation was prohibited by law or would have led to irreparable injury or death).

In other words, the DTSA provides legal immunity for whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets to report illegal behavior, provided they follow the proper procedures outlined above. This immunity clause protects whistleblowers from criminal charges or civil liability under trade secrets laws.

The goal of the immunity provision is to encourage the reporting of suspected illegal activity without fear of negative repercussions. At the same time, it aims to balance the interests of companies in protecting commercially valuable trade secret information.

What is the defend trade secrets act disclaimer?

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) includes a disclaimer stating that an individual cannot be held criminally or civilly liable under any federal or state trade secret law for disclosing a trade secret under certain conditions.

Specifically, the disclaimer covers disclosures made:

In confidence to a federal, state, or local government official, either directly or indirectly
To an attorney, solely for reporting or investigating a suspected legal violation

Additionally, the disclosure must be made under seal in a legal proceeding.

This disclaimer provides legal immunity for whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets about potential legal violations to the government or an attorney. It aims to encourage reporting of corporate wrongdoing while still protecting legitimate trade secrets.

The disclaimer language was added to align with the DTSA's goal of creating a uniform standard for trade secret misappropriation under federal law. It brings the DTSA more in line with the existing Uniform Trade Secrets Act adopted by most states.

In summary, the defend trade secrets act disclaimer provides legal protection for whistleblowers disclosing trade secrets under specific confidential conditions. This attempts to balance the interests of companies in protecting intellectual property with the public interest in reporting potential legal violations.

Scope and Applicability of the DTSA

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides broad protections for trade secrets relating to products and services involved in interstate or foreign commerce.

Protected Information and Materials

The DTSA protects confidential business information that has commercial value, such as:

Formulas, patterns, compilations, programs, devices, methods, techniques, or processes
Business strategies, production processes, pricing, customer lists, financial data
Negative know-how, such as failed research or dead-end concepts

To receive protection, owners must make reasonable efforts to keep the information secret.

Interstate and Foreign Commerce Requirement

For the DTSA to apply, the trade secret must relate to a product or service used in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes technologies, data, and other materials transmitted across state or national borders.

Even trade secrets in localized businesses may qualify if the business engages in interstate commerce activities like selling products or services across state lines.

The Role of the Senate in Shaping the DTSA

The Senate played a key role in shaping the DTSA to balance protecting trade secrets while avoiding hindrances to legitimate competition. Senators ensured:

Protections for whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets about illegal conduct
Safe harbor for those who obtain trade secrets via reverse engineering or independent development
Authority to issue injunctions with clear evidence of misappropriation

These Senate contributions helped craft a balanced law covering a wide range of trade secrets.

Legal Actions and Enforcement Under the DTSA

Seeking a Temporary Restraining Order

To prevent immediate harm to trade secrets, plaintiffs can seek a temporary restraining order (TRO) under the DTSA. The requirements are:

Proof that a trade secret has likely been misappropriated or threatened to be misappropriated
Likelihood of immediate and irreparable harm if the TRO is not granted
Balance of harms favors the plaintiff
Public interest is served by the TRO

The TRO can restrain the defendant from disclosing or using the trade secret. It is typically granted ex parte (without a hearing) and lasts up to 14 days.

Pursuing a Preliminary Injunction

After a TRO expires, a plaintiff can seek a preliminary injunction. The requirements are similar but involve notice to the defendant and a hearing. Courts consider factors like:

Likelihood of success on the merits
Irreparable harm to plaintiff if not granted
Balance of hardships favoring plaintiff
Public interest served

A preliminary injunction prevents disclosure/use of the trade secret during litigation. Plaintiffs should gather evidence to support meeting the requirements.

Filing a Lawsuit for Misappropriated Trade Secrets

To sue for trade secret misappropriation under the DTSA, one must file a civil complaint in federal court. Key steps include:

Identifying all defendants
Specifying the trade secrets at issue
Detailing how they derive value from not being publicly known
Explaining how defendants misappropriated them
Seeking available remedies

Plaintiffs should retain counsel to navigate litigation. Most cases settle before trial.

Remedies and Damages Under the DTSA

If successful, plaintiffs can obtain:

Injunctions against the misappropriation
Monetary damages for actual losses and defendant's unjust enrichment
Exemplary damages up to 2x compensatory damages
Attorney's fees in exceptional cases

Possible criminal penalties also apply for defendants who knowingly misappropriated trade secrets intending to benefit foreign governments, instrumentalities, or agents.

Whistleblower Immunity and Protections

Understanding Legal Immunity for Whistleblowers

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides legal immunity for whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets under certain circumstances. This immunity aims to promote ethical disclosures of wrongdoing without fear of retaliation. Specifically, the law states that individuals cannot be held criminally or civilly liable under any federal or state trade secret law for disclosing a trade secret if it is made in confidence to a government official or attorney. The goal is to allow whistleblowers to safely report suspected illegal behavior.

Permitted Disclosures Under the Law

The DTSA outlines specific scenarios where disclosures qualify for immunity. This includes reporting suspected violations of law or regulation directly to a government official or attorney. It also covers whistleblowers using trade secrets in lawsuits, such as anti-retaliation lawsuits or when filing a complaint or other document under seal. As long as the disclosure was made under seal, meaning confidential, the whistleblower remains immune from liability.

Limitations of the Whistleblower Protection

However, there are boundaries around the DTSA’s immunity clauses. For example, protections do not apply if a whistleblower discloses trade secrets to the public, such as revealing them in a news article. The law also does not protect disclosures made in exchange for compensation. Essentially, the immunity only covers good faith disclosures made confidentially to the proper authorities. It is not a free pass for whistleblowers to openly publicize trade secrets without consequences.

Reporting Economic Espionage: A Case for Whistleblowers

The DTSA’s whistleblower immunity has meaningful implications for reporting economic espionage, which involves stealing proprietary information to benefit a foreign government. Under the law, company insiders who witness such activity can safely come forward to reveal this violation of trade secret laws without personal risk. The immunity provisions make it possible to expose threats to U.S. economic and national security through ethical whistleblowing. However, it remains critical for whistleblowers to disclose information in the appropriate manner to qualify for protections.

Comparative Analysis: DTSA, State Laws, and International Considerations

Contrast With State Laws and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation, creating a uniform standard across the country. Prior to the DTSA, trade secret laws varied widely between states. Most states have adopted some form of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), but there are still differences in definitions and remedies.

Key differences between the DTSA and state laws like the UTSA include:

The DTSA has no statute of limitations, while most states impose a 3-year limit
The DTSA allows ex parte seizures to prevent dissemination of trade secrets, which most state laws do not allow
The DTSA provides for federal jurisdiction and remedies like nationwide service of process, while state laws are confined to state borders

So the DTSA provides some advantages to plaintiffs over state law, with powerful remedies and consistency across jurisdictions. But state laws may still play a role in trade secret cases.

Overlap with the Economic Espionage Act

The Economic Espionage Act (EEA) is a federal criminal statute used to prosecute theft of trade secrets. The DTSA amends the EEA to create a private federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. So there is some overlap:

Both laws use similar definitions of "trade secret" and "misappropriation"
Violations can lead to both civil liability under the DTSA and criminal charges under the EEA
But the DTSA focuses on private civil remedies, while the EEA covers criminal prosecution by the government

So the laws work in tandem - the EEA for criminal enforcement and the DTSA for private companies to pursue civil remedies.

Global Reach: DTSA in the Context of Foreign Commerce

A key aspect of the DTSA is its application to "a trade secret that is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce." So it reaches misappropriation involving international trade.

Some examples of how the DTSA applies globally:

If a U.S. company's trade secrets are stolen overseas, it can bring a DTSA claim in federal court
The law applies to foreign entities operating in or aimed at the U.S. market
Courts can order the seizure of property and data located overseas

So the DTSA provides a way for U.S. companies to protect trade secrets globally and sue in U.S. courts.

Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition: Relevance to the DTSA

The Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition is an influential summary of common law principles related to unfair business practices. Though not binding law, courts often look to the Restatements in interpreting statutes.

As it relates to the DTSA, key connections include:

The DTSA definition of "trade secret" is similar to the Restatement's
The Restatement recognizes trade secret misappropriation as a tort, a framework adopted by the DTSA
Courts may reference the Restatement in interpreting vague terms or filling gaps in the DTSA

So while the Restatement does not directly apply, its guidance on common law trade secret principles can inform application of the DTSA. Courts may reference it as a supplement to statutory language.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) of 2016 is a federal law that provides new tools for companies to protect their trade secrets and intellectual property. Here are some key takeaways:

Critical Provisions Summary

Provides a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation
Allows for ex parte seizures to prevent dissemination of stolen trade secrets
Has whistleblower immunity provisions to encourage reporting of misconduct
Defines trade secrets broadly to include business, technical and financial information

Ramifications for IP Protection Strategies

Strengthens ability for companies to enforce trade secrets in federal court
Creates uniform standard for trade secret misappropriation across states
Provides powerful remedies to halt further disclosure and recover damages
Encourages companies to implement proactive measures to safeguard IP

Preventing Theft and Unfair Competition

To prevent trade secret theft and unfair competition, companies can:

Classify and restrict access to sensitive information
Implement confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements
Educate employees on protecting IP and trade secrets
Monitor systems and data access to detect unauthorized activity

Assessing the Impact of the DTSA

The DTSA has:

Expanded trade secret protections to interstate and foreign commerce
Led to increased trade secret litigation in federal courts
Caused more companies to review their IP protection strategies
Deterred some trade secret theft and economic espionage

While not perfect, the DTSA has enhanced companies' ability to protect their intellectual property and trade secrets. Proactive measures are still essential to fully secure sensitive information and maintain competitive advantage.